An election group Just found evidence sufficient to potentially change The 2024 presidential election results from Trump to Harris

The maps look like they came from a rigged election. The group behind them says they came from Pennsylvania, Georgia, and other swing states in 2024.

A cybersecurity expert’s heat maps showed Kamala Harris was the real winner and Donald Trump only prevailed because of “massive algorithmic fraud” in the swing states.

FULL BOMBSHELL VIDEO OF THE MAPS

The group is the Election Truth Alliance (ETA), a self-described nonpartisan nonprofit that analyzes precinct-level data. Their signature tool is the heat map. In a clean election, they argue, plots of turnout versus candidate vote share should look roughly circular or spherical. In elections with known ballot stuffing or digital manipulation—Russia 2011–12 is their frequent comparison—the plot often shows a “comet trail” shooting up and to the right for one candidate. ETA says they see that same trail in 2024 data from Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Nevada, and even parts of California.

They point to down-ballot discrepancies too. In some New York precincts, Harris received far fewer votes than Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand on the same ballot. In Pennsylvania, University of Michigan election-forensics professor Walter Mebane applied his “eforensics” statistical model and estimated that anywhere from about 25,000 to 225,000 votes in the presidential race could be “possibly fraudulent.” The high end of that range exceeds Trump’s official 120,000-vote margin in the state. Mebane wrote that it was possible “the election was decided or nearly decided by malevolent distortions of electors’ intentions.”